Why A11yWatch VS X
Web accessibility tools comparison
A detailed list of web accessibility tools and features.
Features
| Feature | |
|---|---|
| Live web accessibility testing | |
| WCAG A-AAA audits | |
| Section508 audits | |
| CI pipelines | |
| Command Line Interface | |
| Monitoring | |
| Custom actions to run on pages | |
| Custom request headers configuration | |
| Secure proxy support | |
| Dynamic url handling | |
| Dynamic subdomains testing | |
| Dynamic TLDs testing | |
| Concurrent website testing | |
| Live visual website testing | |
| Handle large workloads and websites | |
| Alt tag recommendations | |
| Web accessibility code remediations directly |
Performance
All benches are done on 8gb linux Github Action containers
| Performance and Costs | |
|---|---|
| Average pages tested per $10 spent | 250,000 |
| https://www.coinbase.com - 5,900 pages | 2 mins |
| https://www.hbo.com - 7,500 pages | 2-3 mins |
| https://a11ywatch.com - 48 pages | 0.1-0.5ms |
Reasons why A11yWatch is faster
Some of the reasons A11yWatch is faster and more efficient than the rest is due to the way we gather our resources with our Rust crawlerand protocol of choice to control the browser. Devtools protocol allows you to manipulate the entire control beyond the UI layer to enhance the way a it would normally load a web app by doing things like intercepting network request, manipulating elements, and more. A11yWatch goes to the next level with optimisations for speed by leveraging multiple technologies like Rust, gRPC streams and efficient algorithms.
Pick the best Wave alternative
Get started with A11yWatch now for affordable and speedy automated web accessibility tools.